<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: #111</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nytalkradio.net/wordpress/podcasts/stealthisradio/111/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nytalkradio.net/wordpress/podcasts/stealthisradio/111/</link>
	<description>NYTalkRadio</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 20:33:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Louis Berne</title>
		<link>http://nytalkradio.net/wordpress/podcasts/stealthisradio/111/comment-page-1/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis Berne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 14:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nytalkradio.net/wordpress/podcasts/?p=467#comment-222</guid>
		<description>For Immediate Release
Monday, May 3, 2010
Gulf Oil Spill: System Not Fit To Be Caretaker of the Planet

Raymond Lotta and Orpheus Available for Interviews

The explosion of the Deepwater Horizon drilling platform that killed 11 workers on April 20 threatens to become a massive and perhaps unparalleled environmental disaster. Current estimates are that 200,000 gallons a day are gushing out of the sea floor, one mile beneath the surface. The spill endangers fragile marshes, ponds, creeks, lakes, and other wetlands making up 40 percent of U.S. total wetlands. Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries estimates that at least 400 species—from shrimp to pelicans to river otters—could be impacted by the oil, including a dozen listed under the Endangered Species Act.

This is a capitalist oil spill. The Gulf of Mexico has been turned into a vast laboratory for deep-water oil drilling to serve capitalism&#039;s relentless drive for profit and strategic control of energy resources. Official U.S. government policy has encouraged this—and has refused to require use of the most advanced technology to stop disasters exactly like this. The inconvenient truth is that this oil leak could have been prevented. But it is &quot;cost-effective&quot; for companies like British Petroleum to scrimp on safety and environmental protection measures and equipment.

The capitalist system depends on highly profitable and environmentally destructive fossil fuels. Remember, the Obama administration just a month ago proposed massively expanding offshore U.S. drilling, while President Obama himself offered this assurance: &quot;oil rigs today generally don&#039;t cause spills.&quot; And this comes after the deliberate failure—engineered mainly by the U.S.—of the December 2009 Copenhagen climate talks to take any meaningful action to stop global warming.

This is outrageous and immoral. What is happening in the Gulf points to the reality that the capitalist system is unable and unwilling to protect the planet and the people.

Raymond Lotta and Orpheus bring a unique communist perspective to global environmental issues:

    * They point to what is driving the push to expand offshore drilling.
    * They analyze why capitalism is the root cause of the planetary environmental crisis.
    * They show why only revolution and socialism are capable of creating a socially just and environmentally sustainable society. 

Raymond Lotta is the author of America in Decline and of Maoist Economics and the Revolutionary Road to Communism; he has been interviewed by the BBC and Agence France-Presse. Orpheus writes on issues of the environment and the antiglobalization movement. Both contributed to the Special Environmental issue of Revolution newspaper, &quot;State of Emergency! The Plunder Of Our Planet, The Environmental Catastrophe and The Real Revolutionary Solution&quot; (revcom.us/a/199/emergency-en.html).
Contact: anniedaymedia@yahoo.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For Immediate Release<br />
Monday, May 3, 2010<br />
Gulf Oil Spill: System Not Fit To Be Caretaker of the Planet</p>
<p>Raymond Lotta and Orpheus Available for Interviews</p>
<p>The explosion of the Deepwater Horizon drilling platform that killed 11 workers on April 20 threatens to become a massive and perhaps unparalleled environmental disaster. Current estimates are that 200,000 gallons a day are gushing out of the sea floor, one mile beneath the surface. The spill endangers fragile marshes, ponds, creeks, lakes, and other wetlands making up 40 percent of U.S. total wetlands. Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries estimates that at least 400 species—from shrimp to pelicans to river otters—could be impacted by the oil, including a dozen listed under the Endangered Species Act.</p>
<p>This is a capitalist oil spill. The Gulf of Mexico has been turned into a vast laboratory for deep-water oil drilling to serve capitalism&#8217;s relentless drive for profit and strategic control of energy resources. Official U.S. government policy has encouraged this—and has refused to require use of the most advanced technology to stop disasters exactly like this. The inconvenient truth is that this oil leak could have been prevented. But it is &#8220;cost-effective&#8221; for companies like British Petroleum to scrimp on safety and environmental protection measures and equipment.</p>
<p>The capitalist system depends on highly profitable and environmentally destructive fossil fuels. Remember, the Obama administration just a month ago proposed massively expanding offshore U.S. drilling, while President Obama himself offered this assurance: &#8220;oil rigs today generally don&#8217;t cause spills.&#8221; And this comes after the deliberate failure—engineered mainly by the U.S.—of the December 2009 Copenhagen climate talks to take any meaningful action to stop global warming.</p>
<p>This is outrageous and immoral. What is happening in the Gulf points to the reality that the capitalist system is unable and unwilling to protect the planet and the people.</p>
<p>Raymond Lotta and Orpheus bring a unique communist perspective to global environmental issues:</p>
<p>    * They point to what is driving the push to expand offshore drilling.<br />
    * They analyze why capitalism is the root cause of the planetary environmental crisis.<br />
    * They show why only revolution and socialism are capable of creating a socially just and environmentally sustainable society. </p>
<p>Raymond Lotta is the author of America in Decline and of Maoist Economics and the Revolutionary Road to Communism; he has been interviewed by the BBC and Agence France-Presse. Orpheus writes on issues of the environment and the antiglobalization movement. Both contributed to the Special Environmental issue of Revolution newspaper, &#8220;State of Emergency! The Plunder Of Our Planet, The Environmental Catastrophe and The Real Revolutionary Solution&#8221; (revcom.us/a/199/emergency-en.html).<br />
Contact: <a href="mailto:anniedaymedia@yahoo.com">anniedaymedia@yahoo.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis Berne</title>
		<link>http://nytalkradio.net/wordpress/podcasts/stealthisradio/111/comment-page-1/#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis Berne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 14:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nytalkradio.net/wordpress/podcasts/?p=467#comment-221</guid>
		<description>Wow! Incredible interview with such an incredible thinker. What strikes you - beyond the substance of Newman&#039;s many observations - is his method... so seamless and casual in describing the amazing [and as you remarked to him: beautiful] complexity of life we encounter at every turn, and how that came to be. He has the quality of voice that makes you feel you are having a conversation while doing the breaststroke side by side with him, barely disturbing the surface of the water, in a quiet indoor pool.

     It was good that you drew him out as to how the fundamentalists will seize on any thoughtful dissection of Darwin &quot;to make trouble.&quot; Newman explains the science without a hint of triumphalism or condescension...you can&#039;t help but love this guy.

      I have heard both speakers below being interviewed on local radio, and I can assure you they would be good material for your show.    Louis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! Incredible interview with such an incredible thinker. What strikes you &#8211; beyond the substance of Newman&#8217;s many observations &#8211; is his method&#8230; so seamless and casual in describing the amazing [and as you remarked to him: beautiful] complexity of life we encounter at every turn, and how that came to be. He has the quality of voice that makes you feel you are having a conversation while doing the breaststroke side by side with him, barely disturbing the surface of the water, in a quiet indoor pool.</p>
<p>     It was good that you drew him out as to how the fundamentalists will seize on any thoughtful dissection of Darwin &#8220;to make trouble.&#8221; Newman explains the science without a hint of triumphalism or condescension&#8230;you can&#8217;t help but love this guy.</p>
<p>      I have heard both speakers below being interviewed on local radio, and I can assure you they would be good material for your show.    Louis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://nytalkradio.net/wordpress/podcasts/stealthisradio/111/comment-page-1/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 22:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nytalkradio.net/wordpress/podcasts/?p=467#comment-87</guid>
		<description>David Barouh says:
May 5, 2010 at 6:34 am  (Edit)

Fascinating show. It was so dense that I had to forcibly suspend my inner commentary in order not to lose the thread of what was being said. Usually in a course you would get one concept to read about, go over it, do homework on it, discuss it, so that the concept gets repeated any number of times. Newman was building one concept onto another, and then recalling previous ones from earlier in the show that the listener had just the briefest time to digest. The host correctly slowed him down and made him repeat.

Analogies like the water molecules and the emergent properties of water really helped. Likewise with his explanation of the rapid evolution of the eye based on the physics involved. that was a good question to pose to him, inspired by the politics involved, but turned into a science lesson nonetheless.

I’ll probably have only the vaguest notion of emergent properties after a while, but what counts is I have it. Not sure if I understood the idea of acquired properties being passed on to succeeding generations. Probably too many
concepts at once. But maybe I can read up on that one. Thanks for the show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Barouh says:<br />
May 5, 2010 at 6:34 am  (Edit)</p>
<p>Fascinating show. It was so dense that I had to forcibly suspend my inner commentary in order not to lose the thread of what was being said. Usually in a course you would get one concept to read about, go over it, do homework on it, discuss it, so that the concept gets repeated any number of times. Newman was building one concept onto another, and then recalling previous ones from earlier in the show that the listener had just the briefest time to digest. The host correctly slowed him down and made him repeat.</p>
<p>Analogies like the water molecules and the emergent properties of water really helped. Likewise with his explanation of the rapid evolution of the eye based on the physics involved. that was a good question to pose to him, inspired by the politics involved, but turned into a science lesson nonetheless.</p>
<p>I’ll probably have only the vaguest notion of emergent properties after a while, but what counts is I have it. Not sure if I understood the idea of acquired properties being passed on to succeeding generations. Probably too many<br />
concepts at once. But maybe I can read up on that one. Thanks for the show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Dubinsky</title>
		<link>http://nytalkradio.net/wordpress/podcasts/stealthisradio/111/comment-page-1/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Dubinsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 20:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nytalkradio.net/wordpress/podcasts/?p=467#comment-86</guid>
		<description>I thought your interview with Stuart Newman was first rate.  I am glad to hear that Biologists are beginning to take seriously the variations in Darwin&#039;s theory of evolution of the kind described in the interview.  I was disappointed, however, that there was no mention of the work of J.Piaget who formulated, some 40 years ago, a theory of evolution very similar to what Newman is suggesting.  Piaget provided a wealth of data from his experiments with mollusks and certain plants (limnaea and sedum) together with theoretical analyses of his results.  The following two books provide a full description of this work. 

Biology and knowledge : an essay on the relations between organic regulations and cognitive processes /  Jean Piaget ; [transl. into English by Beatrix Walsh]. - [1ère éd.]. - Chicago ; London : The University of Chicago Press, 1971. - XII, 384 p. ; 23 cm.

Adaptation and intelligence : organic selection and phenocopy / Jean Piaget ; transl. by Stewart Eames ; foreword by Terrance A. Brown. - Chicago ; London : Univ. of Chicago Press, 1980. - 124 p. : ill. ; 24 cm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought your interview with Stuart Newman was first rate.  I am glad to hear that Biologists are beginning to take seriously the variations in Darwin&#8217;s theory of evolution of the kind described in the interview.  I was disappointed, however, that there was no mention of the work of J.Piaget who formulated, some 40 years ago, a theory of evolution very similar to what Newman is suggesting.  Piaget provided a wealth of data from his experiments with mollusks and certain plants (limnaea and sedum) together with theoretical analyses of his results.  The following two books provide a full description of this work. </p>
<p>Biology and knowledge : an essay on the relations between organic regulations and cognitive processes /  Jean Piaget ; [transl. into English by Beatrix Walsh]. &#8211; [1ère éd.]. &#8211; Chicago ; London : The University of Chicago Press, 1971. &#8211; XII, 384 p. ; 23 cm.</p>
<p>Adaptation and intelligence : organic selection and phenocopy / Jean Piaget ; transl. by Stewart Eames ; foreword by Terrance A. Brown. &#8211; Chicago ; London : Univ. of Chicago Press, 1980. &#8211; 124 p. : ill. ; 24 cm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
